ذأثير انواع هخرلفح هن الوعقواخ على صحح الضرع والحلية الونرج هن اتقار الحلية

هجلح جاهعح ذكريد للعلوم السراعيح الوجلذ) 3 ( العذد) 313( )3 ( ISSN-1813-1646 - عذد خاص توقائع الوإذور العلوي الراتع لعلوم الثروج الحيوانيح ذأثير انواع هخرلفح هن الوعقواخ على صحح الضرع والحلية الونرج هن اتقار الحلية عارف قاسن حسن الحثيطي وحسن هوراز رؤوف قصاب تاشي قسن الثروج الحيوانيح-كليح السراعح والغاتاخ-جاهعح الووصل-العراق الكلواخ الذالح : الضرع اتقار الحلية الوعقواخ 7 Potassium permanganate 5753 Hibitane 5753 6578 للوراسلح : عارف قاسم حسن الحبيطي قسم الثروة الحيوانيت-كليت الزراعت والغاباث-جامعت الموصل-العراق 75 67 7 837 ايويل: dr_alhubaety@yahoocom 857 6576 3378 X 57 7 Effect of Different Types of Disinfectants on Udder Health and Milk Produced From Dairy Cows AKH AL-Hubaety and HMRKassabBashi Department of animal resources College of Agriculture and Forestry- University of Mosul KeyWords: rocket salad, blood plasma, laying breeder Correspondence: AKH AL-Hubaety Department of Animal Resource, College of Agriculture, University of Mosul Email: dr_alhubaety@yahoocom Abstract The current study was carried out on six cross-breed lactating cows, which belong to the animal farm of agriculture and Forestry College / university of Mosul The aim of the research was to evaluate the disinfectant efficiency on udder and teat preparation using two types of antiseptics, Hibitane and potassium permanganate, in a concentration of 75%, 375% and 15% for the first one and % and 4% for the second one Results indicated that Hibitane was the most effective in reducing the total bacterial count of the udder and teats skin and in milk by 991% and 836% at a concentration of (75%), while the other two concentrations (375% and 15%) were effective in reducing the total bacterial count of the udder and teats skin by 937 and 87% and in milk by 733 and 65% respectively In respect to the second disinfectant, the higher percentage of potassium permanganate (4%) was more effective than the lower percentage (%) in reducing the total count of bacteria by 88% and 73% on the udder and teats skin, and by 631 and 556% in milk respectively However, a total somatic cell count of the produced milk of the tested cows was 9-39 X1 4 before achievement of the experiment, to ensure the healthy condition of the cow's udder 53

1983 Eberhart (1997) Bencini Pulina 6 8) Richard Trevor) 8 55 Tolle 8 65 ) ( 5 3 5753 5 3 Miller 1995 Rautala Myllus ) (199 Ingawaet 1993 (6 Amer ( 3 Berry) Pavicic) 5 Hamid Abdel Moneiem ) ( Colony forming unit, ) Count x 1/dilution = Inoculum (Himedia (Nutrient (Peptone water) 5 Alfred agar) ( Somatic cells count) Direct Kagkli (1984 Pankey 199 5 Hutchison 7 Galton 68 6 Galton 6 Ingawa 1991 Adkinson 1997 Dohoo Ruegg 1993 Oliver 58

5 microscopic total leukocytic count Coles) 1986 3 55 555 555555 5 55555 533555 3 585555 8 5555 66 47 8 88 8 57 5753 8 7 78 58 5 8 5753 8 8 7 58 78 61 1 5753 3 8

56 1786 17486 176 8 3 8 3 66 5 3 53 8 3 7 1713 1715 3 8 1713 1715 66 5 3 53 7 5753 7 67 6576 78

النسبة المئىية لتقليل اعذاد الجراثيم النسبة المئىية لتقليل اعذلذ الجراثيم 1% ( 199 Matthews ) 73% 88% 87% 937% 991% 1% 8% 87% 556% 631% 65% 733% 836% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 416% KMnO4 الماء KMnO4 4 15 375 75 6% 4% % % % المطهرات المستخذمة وتراكيزهب KMnO4 KMnO4 4 15 المطهرات الستخذمة وتراكيزهب الماء 375 75 1% % 3 5753 6578 6578 7 75 5753 837 7 3378 75 857 837 67 67 Cetrimide Chlorhexidine Pavicic (3) Chlorhexidine Ruegg Schreiner) 1977 Wilson) 3 1997 Dohoo Ruegg) 5 5 65 (8) Gibson 857 3378 Gleeson 55 Abdel Moneim, E S, Hamid A D ( 5 ) Chemical and Microbiological Characteristics of Raw Milk Produced by Staphylococcus Streptococcus spp 3 3 spp 5

symposium on veterinary epidemiology and economics, 7th Nairobi, Kenya Proceedings, pp 41-45 Matthews, K R, Harmon R J and Lanylois, BE (199)Prevalence of staphylococcus sspduring the peri parturient period in primiparous andmultiparous cows J Dairy Sci 75:1835-1839 Miller, RH, Paape, MJ, Fulton, LA (1993) The relationship of milk somatic cell count to milk yields Irish Veterinary Journal Volume 6 Number 7467for Holstein heifers after first calving J Dairy Sci76: 78-733 Myllys, V, Rautala, H (1995)Characterisation of clinical mastitis in primiparous heifers J Dairy Sci78: 538-545 Oliver, S P, Lewis M J, Ingle T L, Gilespie B E, Matthews K R, Dowlen H H (1993) Premilking teat disinfection for the prevention of environmental pathogen intramammary infections J Food Protect 56: 85-855 Panky, J W (1989)Premilking udder hygiene J Dairy Sci 7:138-131 Pavicic, Z, T, Balenovic M V, Tofant A, Matkovic K (3) Application of disinfectant in the preparation of the udder for milking Proceedings of actual questions of animal bioclimatology, 8December,Brno,CzechRepublic, pp 86-9 Pulina, G, Bencini R (1997)The quality of sheep milk :A review Australian Jour of Exper Agri 37:485-54 Ruegg, P L, Dohoo, I R (1997) A benefit to cost analysis of the effect of premilking teat hygiene on somatic cell count and intramammary infections in a commercial dairy herd CanVetJ 38: 63-636 Saran, A (1995)Disinfectant in the dairy par lour Rev sci tech off int Epiz 14:7-4 Schreiner, DA, Ruegg, PL (3) Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis J of Dairy Sci 86:346-3465 Tolle A (198) The microflora of the udder: Factors Influencing the Bacteriological Quality of Raw Milk International Dairy Federation Bulletin, Document 1 Trevor, J B, and Richard, K (8) Advance dairy science and technology, Blackwell pp 3 Wilson, DJ, Das, HH, Ruegg, RN (1997) Association between management practices, dairy herd characteristics, and somatic cell count of bulk tank milk Journal of American Veterinary and Medical Association 1: 1499-15 Smallholder Farmers in Gezira (Sudan)U of K J Agric Sci 13 : 367-378 Adkinson, R W, Gough, R H, and Ryan, J J (1991) Use of individual, premoisted, disposable wipes in preparing cow teats for milking and resultant raw milk quality and production J Food Port 54:957-959 Alfred E Brown, (5) Microbiology Application, pages 143-151, published by McGraw-Hill, a business unit of McGraq-Hill companies, Inc 11 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 1 Berry, DP, Amer, PR (6) Proceedings of the Irish Grassland and annual production association, Tullamore, 15-16 March : 3-8 Coles, E H (1986) Veterinary clinical pathology 4th Ed Saunders company, Philadelphia, London, Toronto Eberhart, R J, Levaa P L, Grieljr L C, Kesler, E M (1983) Germicidal teat dip in aherd with low prevalence of S agalactiaeand S aureusmastitis J Dairy Sci 64: 139-1395 Galton, D M, Adkinson, R W, Thomas, C V, and Smith, T W (198) Effects of premilking udder preparation on environmental bacterial contamination of milk J Dairy Sci 65:154-1543 Gibson, H, S, LA, Brizuela, C M (8) Effectiveness of selected pre-milking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load on commercialdairy farms Letters in Applied Microbiology 46: 95-3 Glesson, D, Brien, B O, and Flynn, J (9) Effect of pre milking teat preparation procedure on the microbial count on teats prior to cluster application, Irish Vet J7:461-467 Hutchison, ML, Thomas, DJI, Moore, A (5) An evaluation of raw microorganisms as markers of on-farm hygiene practices related to milking Journal of Food Protection 68: 764-77 Ingawa, K H, Adkinson, R W, Gough R H (199) Evaluation of a gel teat cleaning and sanitizing compound for premilking hygiene J Dairy Sci 75: 14-13 Kagkli, DM, Vancanneyt, M, Vandamme, P (7) Contamination of milk by enterococci and coliforms from bovine faces J of App Micro13: 1393-145 Lam, T J G M, de Jong, M C M, Schukken Y H (1996) Mathematical modeling to estimate efficacy of post milking teat disinfection in split - udder trials of dairy cows International 5